Explore
the data
198 brands. 7,278 citations. Five interactive views into the same dataset.
Brands tracked
Citations analysed
AI platforms
Visibility is a spectrum, not a binary
Every brand plotted by BVS (x-axis) and AI coverage — how often they're mentioned across all four platforms (y-axis). Four quadrants, four strategies.
The shape of visibility
The BVS curve is heavily skewed: a dense cluster in the 10-30% range, then a long thin tail of winners.
The platforms disagree
Ask the same question to all four AIs. They give a different top answer 28% of the time.
- 1.Microsoft Teams
- 2.Zoom
- 3.Slack
- 1.Zoom
- 2.Microsoft Teams
- 3.Slack
- 1.Zoom
- 2.Slack
- 3.Microsoft Teams
- 1.Slack
- 2.Microsoft Teams
- 3.Zoom
of queries disagree
problem-query drop
Category queries get answered. Problem queries don't — the same brands vanish when users describe symptoms instead of solutions.
AI trusts twenty domains
48.7% of 7,278 citations come from 20 domains out of 1,350. Switch platforms — the galaxy reshapes.
Sector deep dives
Four mini-reports, each with a leader, a pattern, and an anomaly worth knowing.
35.1% average BVS is the highest of any segment. GitHub's 75% BVS is achieved by being the default answer for both "version control" and "developer tools" queries.
Dominant sub-category leaders (GitHub, Figma, Mailchimp) win on depth — they appear in every query variation of their niche.
Loom (9.1% BVS). A billion-dollar product that AI barely recognises. Lattice and Deel — both late-stage startups — sit in the bottom 5.
Where does your brand sit?
Check your AI visibility across all 4 platforms. Free, instant.
Check your brand